View as Microsoft Word* | View as PDF
Track the Trends - Predict the Future? Rubric
Name:____________________________________________________
| |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
| Research |
- Our topic/related data is ideal for LR analysis.
- Our data set is complete and error-free.
- We have multiple sources that are used to validate data.
- We consistently demonstrate effective research procedures.
|
- Our topic/related data is appropriate for LR analysis.
- Our data set is complete with few errors.
- Our data source is valid and clearly identified.
- We often demonstrate effective research procedures.
|
- Our topic/related data is not ideal for LR analysis.
- Our data is limited by too few intervals or numerical values.
- Our data source may not be clearly identified or validated.
- Our research is inefficient or heavily teacher-guided.
|
- Our topic/related data is not appropriate for LR analysis.
- Our data is incomplete or limited.
- Our data source is not identified or validated.
- Our research phase was conducted with heavy reliance on the teacher.
|
| Mathematical Modeling and Predictions |
- We use several modes of technology to complete the project.
- Our interpretation of data is well-founded.
- Our predictions are clearly stated and backed by data.
|
- We use technology to model and interpret data with a function and a graph.
- Our interpretation of data is accurate.
- Our predictions are made and backed by data.
|
- Our data is modeled by a graph or function.
- Our interpretation of data has flaws.
- Our predictions are unclear or not backed by data.
|
- Our data is not clear enough to be modeled by a graph or function.
- Our interpretation of data is limited or very flawed.
- Our predictions are limited or misguided.
|
| Implications and Predictive Validity of Model |
- We discuss all implications.
- Our discussion of predictive validity is clear, compelling, and insightful.
|
- We clearly discuss the most important implications.
- Our discussion of predictive validity is clear.
|
- We discuss several but not all of the basic implications.
- Our discussion of predictive validity is unclear.
|
- We have a limited discussion of implications.
- Our discussion of predictive validity is limited.
|
| Elements of Design |
- We show clear evidence of a plan for a clear, varied presentation.
- Our slides are easy to understand.
- We used effects, graphics, and sounds that enhance the information presented.
- Our publication format is very clear and easy to read.
- Users can progress intuitively throughout our entire project in a logical path to find information. All buttons and navigational tools work.
|
- We show adequate evidence of a plan for a clear, interesting presentation.
- Most of our slides are easy to understand.
- We used some effects and graphics to enhance the project.
- Our publication format is clear and easy to read.
- Few difficulties arise when navigating throughout our entire project in a logical path to find information. Most buttons and navigational tools work.
|
- We show some evidence of a plan for a clear, interesting presentation.
- Some of our slides are easy to understand.
- The effects and graphics we used may not enhance the project.
- Our publication format is somewhat clear and easy to read.
- Some difficulties arise when navigating throughout our entire project in a logical path to find information. Some buttons and navigational tools work.
|
- We show no evidence of a plan for a presentation.
- We show no evidence of a unique presentation quality or new thought.
- Our effects and graphics do not enhance the project.
- Our publication format is not clear and is difficult to read.
- Many difficulties are present when navigating throughout our entire project. There is no logical path. Few buttons and navigational tools work.
|
< Return to Assessment Plan
< Return to Track the Trends