View as Microsoft Word* | View as PDF
|
|
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
| Evidence |
Presents a clear and accurate handling of all available evidence that addresses the central point of the claim. All evidence is properly documented and evaluated. |
Presents all relevant evidence needed to support the claim with no major errors. Most evidence is properly documented and all evidence is properly evaluated. |
Provides evidence for the claim, but may not address all necessary aspects. Most evidence is properly documented and evaluated. |
Fails to provide convincing evidence for the claim. Student shows lack of understanding of proper documentation and evaluation. |
| Claim |
Claim is clearly stated, focused on topic, and thoroughly explained. Rating of claim reflects realistic understanding of process. |
Claim is stated, focused on topic, and explained. Rating of claim reflects understanding of process. |
Claim is stated, focused on topic, and somewhat explained. Explanation shows some lack of understanding of the topic or claim, or the claim rating reflects an unrealistic understanding of process. |
Claim is not clearly stated or is unfocused on topic. Explanation is missing or lacking understanding of the topic. Claim rating is incomplete or unrealistic. |
| Relational Evidence |
Student shows a clear and deep understanding of evidence in relation to the claim. Rationale of support (non-support) reflects an in-depth understanding. |
Student shows a basic understanding of evidence in relation to the claim. Rationale of support (non-support) reflects understanding. |
Student consistently shows some understanding of evidence in relation to the claim. Rationale of support (non-support) reflects some understanding. |
Student shows a weak or inconsistent understanding of the relationship between evidence and claim. Rationale does not support rating or is missing. |
| Conclusion |
Conclusion reflects understanding of depth and complexity of topic based on evidence gathered. Includes concise explanation and refutation of alternative perspectives. Conclusion is clearly related to claim. |
Conclusion reflects understanding of topic based on evidence gathered. Includes good explanation and response to key alternative arguments. Conclusion is related to claim. |
Conclusion reflects some understanding of topic based on evidence gathered. Little attention is paid to alternative perspectives, or conclusion is not clearly related to claim. |
Conclusion is not related to claim or does not show relationship between claim, evidence, and conclusion. Alternative perspectives are not addressed. |
< Return to Assessment Plan
< Return to Designer Genes